Reports are only as good as the trust placed in them.
What that really means is that trust is a function of asserted data and processing quality.
Ask any data scientist or analyst, it's 90% of the grunt work which is required upfront for data to have real value.
Sure, scale report generation, cool.
If you can't scale data quality and processing quality (in the sense alignment with the intended report use), reports aren't worth anything or have negative value if they lead to wrong decisions.
Guess who they're gonna call if a RAG report is erroneous or plain wrong?
Exactly, the research team the author calculated as obsolete...
thenaturalist 10 hours ago |
This is imo a somewhat shortsighted take.
Reports are only as good as the trust placed in them.
What that really means is that trust is a function of asserted data and processing quality.
Ask any data scientist or analyst, it's 90% of the grunt work which is required upfront for data to have real value.
Sure, scale report generation, cool.
If you can't scale data quality and processing quality (in the sense alignment with the intended report use), reports aren't worth anything or have negative value if they lead to wrong decisions.
Guess who they're gonna call if a RAG report is erroneous or plain wrong?
Exactly, the research team the author calculated as obsolete...